The key reason why, among the numerous videos about aliens, UFOs and the alleged origins of man, which literally flooded the Internet, three videos by YouTube user Mauro Biglino, an Italian writer, essayist and translator, were selected for this article is that a translator who was in charge of translating the Masoretic texts from ancient Hebrew for the Vatican publishing house Edizioni San Paolo is expected to know at least enough about the Bible to be able to recognize the presence of astronomy/astrology in it. In a video recently posted on YouTube under the title UAP, Fifth Release of the Pentagon: Spheres, Triangles, and Biblical Mysteries, Biglino connects the Pentagon’s recordings of spherical and triangular shapes of unidentified objects with biblical mysteries.

How come Biglino doesn’t question why the Pentagon published its fifth edition dedicated to UAPs? Why does the Pentagon want us to know the “truth” about UAP (Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena), while hiding the truth about the background of the wars that the US has been waging against other countries for decades? Why do the Pentagon, the US government, the FBI, US presidents, politicians, members of the Rockefeller dynasty, UFO researchers, authors … want people to chant more and more “aliens are among us” instead of revealing how the process of The Great Taking takes place behind the scenes, after which “we will have nothing and be happy”?

Or let us ask ourselves, as Matthew Ehret, Canadian author and editor-in-chief of Canadian Patriot Reviews, did in an article „What do UFOs, Laurence Rockefeller and MK Ultra Have in Common? More than you think”, why leading politicians like former House Majority speaker Harry Reid had allocated $22 millions of tax payer dollars to UFO research, why Obama’s former chief counsellor (and accused pedophile) John Podesta has openly called for UFO disclosure on several public occasions since 2002, or why Hillary Clinton herself called for UFO disclosure during her presidential campaign pledges of 2015? Laurence Rockefeller, the 4th son of Standard Oil founder John D. Rockefeller, not only had close ties to both the Clintons and John Podesta, and not only funded research into psychoactive plants to induce a psychic connection with extraterrestrials, Ehret continues, but also recruited renowned UFOlog Steven Greer to be the controller of the Disclosure project. Greer has given thousands of interviews  promoting the narrative  that NASA’s Apollo Lunar projects were stopped in 1972 merely because the aliens who have been stationed on the Moon for eons didn’t want the truth to leak out (but were at least kind enough to let us keep the technology they gave us earlier in Roswell in the 1950s).In connection with the Roswell case, see episode 4. of documentary serial Hidden Hand Behind UFO – Roswell and the Birth of a New Legend.

Or, since we’ve already mentioned the Pentagon’s UAP release, we can also ask this question: does the Pentagon report in its “new dossier of material spanning over seventy years, from 1950 to 2026” how, in order to cover up secret military operations, false statements were made to encourage the public to believe in UFO stories? As David Cenciotti – a computer engineer, former lieutenant in the Italian Air Force who flew several fighter jets, and founder and editor of “The Aviationist”, one of the most widely read military aviation blogs in the world – writes in the text The Blackbird NASA Used For Validating SR-71 Linear Aerospike Experiment Configuration:

“Throughout its career, the high-altitude SR-71s, involved in test flights as well as operative missions, have probably contributed to fuel UFO (Unidentified Flying Object) conspiracy theories. For instance, according to CIA high-altitude testing of the then new and secret U-2 led to an increase in reports of UFOs:

“According to later estimates from CIA officials who worked on the U-2 project and the OXCART (SR-71, or Blackbird) project, over half of all UFO reports from the late 1950s through the 1960s were accounted for by manned reconnaissance flights (namely the U-2) over the United States. This led the Air Force to make misleading and deceptive statements to the public in order to allay public fears and to protect an extraordinarily sensitive national security project. While perhaps justified, this deception added fuel to the later conspiracy theories and the coverup controversy of the 1970s.“

Fast forward to 2017, we can’t but notice that, among the theories surrounding the footage of an unidentified flying object (UFO) filmed by an F/A-18F Super Hornet in 2004, there is also the one that the weird “capsule-shaped” object might have been some sort of secret aerial vehicle during a test mission rather than an alien spacecraft…. And it would not be the first time.

In the article The U.S.-Government UFO Cover-UP is Real – But It’s not what you think, adopted to the book UFO The Inside Story at the US Government’s Search for Alien Life Here – and Out there, author Garrett M. Graff says that a roundabout and convoluted comment by John Brennan, the former director of the CIA, prompted his research, in which he found that plenty revelations, declassified documents, and public reports suggest an active, ongoing deception. Just as Cenciotti cites secret military government programs, Graf does the same, adding that other reported UFO sightings are advanced technologies from foreign adversaries—such as Russia, China, and Iran—being tested against U.S. defenses.

In his poem „Marmion“ – Paul i Phillip Collins write in the text Deception Through Disclosure. Part 1: Decoding David Grus Enigma, [Part 2: More Spooks, Complicit Media and Deep State-Sponsoed Fringe Science – here] – Sir Walter Scott wrote the following: “Oh what a tangled web we weave, when we first practice to deceive.” Those verses come to mind whenever these writers explore the background of the more recent crop of so-called UFO whistleblowers. Even a cursory examination of these individuals reveals an intricate constellation of institutions and personages commonly associated with covert political power. United States Air Force officer and former intelligence official David Grusch is no exception to that rule. 

For Grush’s statement about o involvement of US Government in the recovery and reverse engineering of “non-human” spacecraft , Brian Cox, professor of particle physics at the University of Manchester, wrote on his X profile:

Is Ezekiel’s vision a close encounter with an unidentified object?

“The Spaceships of Ezekiel (1974.) is a book of Josef F. Blumrich (1913.-2002.) about a spaceship that was supposedly observed by the prophet Ezekiel, written while the author was chief of NASA’s systems layout branch of the program development office at the Marshall Space Flight Center.. … After ufologists such as Erich von Däniken had pointed to the possibility of interpreting Ezekiel’s vision as a report of an extraterrestrial spacecraft, Blumrich decided to disprove the hypothesis. However, a thorough examination convinced him that Ezekiel had, in fact, seen a spaceship. He then made detailed drawings of the alien craft. … Blumrich asserts that Ezekiel’s account in the Bible was not a description of a meeting with God in a prophetic vision, but one of several encounters with ancient astronauts in a shuttlecraft from another planet.” (You can read the book in pdf format here.)

In the video mentioned at the beginning of the text at 9:17′ Mauro Biglino says:

“For example, in our book [Dragons of Paradise, italian: Draghi dell Eden, co-authored with Paul Wallis] we point out that the biblical texts use various terms to describe what moves in the air, terms with which you are now very familiar, ‘ruach’ [more on this word later in the text], ‘kavod’, ‘merkava’ and so on. Religious tradition has often, indeed always, transformed them into spiritual entities or symbolic, metaphorical and allegorical elements. But the text, read without a theological filter, sometimes describes something that moves, producing very clear physical effects, … We can admit that this does not prove with certainty that these were flying machines, but it shows that a spiritual translation is not the only possible one.”

If, according to Biglino, we turn off the theological filter and discard the symbolic, metaphorical, and allegorical elements with which the Bible is filled, as partially shown in the text Who Were the Israelites and What Does Solomon’s Temple Symbolize, then what is left of the Bible? A single word that anyone can interpret as they wish?

Not “spirit” (of God), but “force” (Hebrew: ruach), is the new change in the Bible (Ezekiel 3:12) in Italian, an editorial project by Einaudi on which 12 biblical scholars worked. Biglino discusses the content of the preface to the Bible, as well as the reasons why, in his opinion, this change is justified, in the video The Forbidden Bible (La Bibbia Proibita):

It says here [Biglino quotes the verse]: “Then the spirit lifted me up, and I heard behind me a roar, a great earthquake, while the glory of the Lord moved from that place”. The expression ‘spirit’ disappears and is replaced by ‘force’.

It is not known why the 12 biblical scholars replaced ‘spirit‘ with ‘force‘, but perhaps an explanation can be found in a lecture given in Berlin in 1908 by Rudolf Steiner, the founder of anthroposophy. Steiner says:

The distribution of forces in our Earth existence may be conceived as follows:—on the one side forces are descending from the Zodiac [belt of 12 constellations around the sky through which the Sun, the Moon, and the planets move] and, on the other, forces are ascending to the Zodiac. Such is the mysterious interplay between the Zodiac and our Earth. Forces descend and forces ascend. This is the mysterious “heavenly ladder” upon which forces are descending and ascending. These forces are indicated in various ways in the different scriptures; you find them indicated, too, in Goethe’s Faust …

We think of the forces which are now involved in the ascending line of evolution, collectively, as Aries, Taurus, Gemini, Cancer, Leo, Virgo, Libra—because they actually belong to these constellations. These seven constellations comprise the ascending forces. The descending forces are comprised, approximately speaking, in the five constellations of Scorpio, Sagittarius, Capricorn, Aquarius, Pisces. …

Kao što smo učinili u ovom tekstu, i ovdje ćemo citirati Florina Diacua, profesora matematike na Sveučilištu Viktoria, koji kaže:

A horoscope depicts the positions of the sun, the moon, and the planets Mercury, Venus, Mars,Jupiter, and Saturn among the standard twelve zodiacal constellations at a given time. Except for Mercury and Venus, which are never too far from the sun, with a span of three constellations for the former and five for the latter, the other planets may show up anywhere. As a result, there are 3, 732, 480 possible configurations for these celestial bodies. Because of the planets’ fast motion, horoscopes change almost daily.

What drives the planets to move fast and change positions almost daily? Are they ascending and descending forces”? Whether the biblical scholars meant the ‘forces’ that Steiner described when they changed ‘spirit’ to ‘force’, let the readers decide for themselves.

To better understand the meaning of the Hebrew word ruach, Biglino refers to another of his videos, filled with images of flying saucers, entitled Ruach (The Force), in which he speaks together with colleague and collaborator Paul Wallis.

Biglino bases his theory that Ezekiel’s vision was actually an encounter with a flying saucer on three things: an explanation of the meaning of the Hebrew word ‘ruach’ [wind, moving air, or even something moving in the air] and ‘mare‘ [the concrete act of seeing something real], and just one verse from Ezekiel.

And I looked, and, behold, a whirlwind came out of the north, a great cloud, and a fire infolding itself, and a brightness was about it, and out of the midst thereof as the colour of amber, out of the midst of the fire. Ezekiel 1,4

Thus Ezekiel, explains Biglino, claims to have specifically seen events in which the Elohim [according to Biglino, the Hebrew word in the plural meaning gods] were present with their flying structures … he remembered the exact day and place. The fifth day of the fourth month of the year (probably 593, 592 BC) of Jehoiakim’s exile. … The Ruach comes from a precisely defined geographical direction, from the north, while Ezekiel is on the banks of the Chebar Canal, a watercourse that branches off from the Euphrates in lower Mesopotamia.

Biglino concludes:

We are not in the presence of a mystical experience or a dream vision, but of a concrete event and experience that the prophet actually lived through and which he described in detail. Thus we have a description of what could have been a real close encounter with an unidentified object that was undoubtedly in the air: a storm cloud coming from the north that has some kind of fire (propulsion systems?) in its center that is spinning around it…

Ezekiel’s vision is an astronomical description, scientists say

What is immediately apparent in Biglino’s presentation is the fact that he draws conclusions based on just one verse, ignoring everything else described in chapters 1 and 10 of the book of Ezekiel. Also, Biglino pretends as if astronomy/astrology does not exist in the Bible.

Let us pay attention to the content of the following verse in Ezekiel 1,10:

As for the likeness of their faces, they four had the face of a MAN [AQUARIUS, Water Bearer; zodiacal constellation], and the face of a LION [LEO; zodiacal constellation], on the right side: and they four had the face of an OX [TAURUS; zodiacal constellation] on the left side; they four also had the face of an EAGLE [EAGLE, Ophiuchus, Serpent Bearer, later Scorpius, zodiacal constellation].

„No, it wasn’t a flying saucer. Ezekiel’s visions are about an enthroned God who controls the cycles of time (the zodiac and its movements), and is up to something … – says Dr. Michael Heiser, a biblical scholar, author, and expert on Semitic languages ​​who has proposed that Ezekiel’s visions in chapters 1 and 10 of the book of Ezekiel be interpreted astrologically. The vision interprets the wheels of the divine throne or chariot as the circle of the zodiac, and beings as the four constellations associated with the cardinal points of the world. The mysterious eyes on the rims of the wheels throughout the being are the stars that make up the zodiac and the celestial background of the scene.

According to Heiser, Ezekiel had two visions, one in chapter 1 and the other in chapter 10. In both visions he saw the same thing. In fact, Ezekiel himself says in chapter 10 that the beings he saw in chapter 1 by the river Chebar were the same beings (10:15) he saw in the second vision.

Speaking of the vision in chapter 1, Heiser quotes Dan Block in his two-volume commentary on the text of Ezekiel who pictures four faces = four directions = four cardinal points; then Leslie Allen in the World Biblical Commentary, vol. 1, who also suggests four directions. The faces of the being correspond to the four cardinal points of the zodiac.

The most significant thing, Heiser considers, is the eyes, Heb. ‘ayin’. In Ezekiel we read that the wheels were “full of eyes.” Ezekiel also uses the same word in the same chapter to describe “sparkling” or “gleaming” (compare Ezek 1:4; Ezek 1:16). In chapter 10 both the creatures and the wheels have “eyes” = stars (shining, sparkling things). What creatures have stars in them? The ones you see in the sky – the signs of the zodiac, points out Dr. Heiser.

In chapter 1. Mediaeval Astronomy in the Old Testament Book of Ezekiel, 1.2. The description of the Milky Way and the Ophiuchus constellation, in the book History: Fiction or Science, vol. 1, p. 168, Russian mathematician and academician Anatoly T. Fomenko provides an astronomical explanation for the same verse that Biglino interprets as a description of a flying saucer:

The Bible says: “And I looked, and, behold, a whirlwind came out of the north, a great cloud, and a fire infolding itself, and a brightness was about it [a more exact translation would be “an irradiance like a river of light,” …” (Ezekiel 1:4).

The irradiance goes to the south from the north. Since the events take place in the starlit sky, as we have mentioned above, this reference most probably means the Milky Way, which may really be perceived as a luminous river of light going to the south from the north.

The Biblical observer looks towards the luminosity and sees that “out of the midst thereof came the likeness of four living creatures [the Hebraic text uses the term “living entities,” whereas the synodal translation refers to them as “beasts,” … they had the likeness of a man” (Ezekiel 1:5).

Nearly every astronomical map from the Middle Ages – see fig. 4.1, for instance – has a constellation in the south, right in the middle of the Milky Way, that has the shape of a man – the Ophiuchus (see fig. 4.2).

“Gdje su svi?”

According to Britannica:

Fermi paradox, contradiction between the seemingly high likelihood for the emergence of extraterrestrial intelligence and the lack of evidence for its existence. The paradox has two broad forms: (1) Why has Earth not already been visited? and (2) Why is there no evidence for extraterrestrial intelligence at all?

The Fermi paradox emerged from a conversation between physicists Enrico Fermi, Edward Teller, Emil Konopinski, and Herbert York at Los Alamos in the summer of 1950 about flying saucers and the likelihood of faster-than-light interstellar travel. The conversation moved on to other subjects, but Fermi brought the discussion back to aliens with, as Teller put it, “the quite unexpected question ‘Where is everybody?’” York recalled later that Fermi argued that when considering various probabilities such as those of Earthlike planets, intelligent life, and the lifetime of intelligent civilizations, Earth should already have been visited many times by aliens.

Brian Cox, professor of particle physics at the University of Manchester, whom we quoted in connection with David Grush’s testimony, explaining the Fermi Paradox and the Grand Filter Hypothesis as a solution to the Fermi Paradox in this short video, says:

The power of the Fermi paradox ultimately it’s not dogmatic. It’s the opposite of being dogmatic. It’s saying that we have not yet observed anyone. … it’s not to say there isn’t anybody out there, it is to say there’s an observation here that we don’t see anyone at the moment.